Romney on LGBT rights – Hold Mitt accountable …by Jamie Citron, BarackObama.com


The Mitt Romney who ran for U.S. Senate in 1994 promised voters in Massachusetts that he’d be a stronger advocate for LGBT rights than Senator Kennedy.

  And in 2002, while running for governor of Massachusetts, Romney’s campaign passed out fliers for Pride Weekend, saying “All citizens deserve equal rights regardless of their sexual preference.” But on Sunday afternoon, Mitt Romney’s current campaign actually disavowed that 2002 flier.

You’re probably wondering a few things. First, just exactly which part of that flier doesn’t he agree with? And second, what could have possibly changed between Sunday morning (when Romney said he felt gays and lesbians deserved “full rights”) and Sunday afternoon? Maybe he thinks that line won’t play as well in the upcoming South Carolina primary?

It’s election season again, and the only Mitt we really know is the one who will say whatever it takes to win. If he is the Republican nominee, we can expect him to suddenly try and be best friends with LGBT voters again. That’s why we’re sending him the message that it doesn’t work like that — and that we won’t let him get away with it.

Say you’ll help hold Mitt accountable before he has a chance to pander yet again:

 

Mitt’s going to try to be whoever he thinks he needs to be to get elected — it’s our job to make sure those tactics come at a cost.

Stay tuned,

Jamie

Jamie Citron
Director, LGBT Vote
Obama for America

President Obama Speaks to Environmental Protection Agency Staff


on Jan 10, 2012

President Obama thanks the staff of the Environmental Protection Agency for the work they do, which touches on the lives of every American, from the food we eat, to the water we drink, to the air we breathe. January 10, 2012.

Category:

a message from Al Franken …


I’m writing to thank everyone who helped keep our grassroots organization strong in 2011.

 If you’re a longtime TeamFranken supporter who continued standing with us in 2011: THANK YOU!

 If you made your first contribution in 2011: THANK YOU!

 If your name is Ted: THANK YOU, TED!

 If you could only afford a small gift: THANK YOU!

 If you could afford a large gift, but only gave a small one: THANK YOU ANYWAY!

 If you forgot to give but really meant to and totally would have except you got distracted at the last minute and now you feel awful: THANK YOU, I GUESS — AND PLEASE CLICK HERE TO GIVE NOW AND ALLEVIATE YOUR GUILT!http://www.alfranken.com/page/m/6cf7873/715407ea/31809885/7816454a/2228609982/VEsH/

 If you recruited friends to give: THANK YOU (AND THEM)!

 If you skipped your morning coffee for a week in order to make a contribution: THANK YOU, AND I HOPE YOU DIDN’T SCREW UP ANY IMPORTANT WORK DEADLINES!

 If you gave because you’re married to me: THANKS, FRANNI — I LOVE YOU!

 I’m pretty sure that covers everybody.

 THANK YOU ALL,

 Al

 P.S.: If you contributed because you love our tradition of including an extra “ask” in the P.S. of every email: THAT’S KIND OF WEIRD — BUT THANK YOU, AND WON’T YOU PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE AN ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION NOW?

the Progress Report


270 Times Bigger

By ThinkProgress War Room on Jan 10, 2012 at 5:16 pm

An Economic Agenda for the Wealthiest 1 Percent, 270 Times Over

Last week, we reported on the Republican candidates’ economic agenda for the wealthiest 1 Percent. Citizens for Tax Justice (CTJ) crunched the numbers on several of the candidates’ tax plans and found that on average they would give the wealthiest 1 Percent a tax cut up to 270 times larger than what the middle class would receive under their plans.

Here’s the rundown.

  • Newt Gingrich would give the wealthiest 1 Percent an average tax cut of $391,330, or more than 190 times larger than what a middle income American would receive under his plan.
  • Jon Huntsman’s plan was not reviewed by CTJ; however, an earlier CAP Action Fund analysis found that Huntsman would give a half-million dollar tax break to each the wealthiest 0.1 Percent of Americans, while raising taxes on veterans, seniors, students, and most middle class families.
  • Ron Paul’s plan was not reviewed by CTJ, but he has called for repealing the 16th amendment altogether, cutting corporate taxes, and instituting a flat tax, which would regressively target lower and middle income Americans.
  • Rick Perry would give the wealthiest 1 Percent an average tax cut of $272,730, or more than 270 times larger than what a middle income American would receive under his plan.
  • Mitt Romney would give the wealthiest 1 Percent an average tax cut of $126,450, or more than 100 times larger than what a middle income American would receive under his plan. What’s more, a CAP Action Fund analysis of Tax Policy Center data found that Romney’s plan would actually raise taxes on half of middle class families with children.
  • Rick Santorum would give the wealthiest 1 Percent an average tax cut of $217,500, or more than 100 times larger than what a middle income American would receive under his plan.

As we reported last week, these gigantic tax cuts for the very wealthiest Americans are paired with cuts that would be devastating to the other 99 Percent of Americans, including deep cuts to Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, and other vital programs and services that Americans depend on each and every day.

VIDEO — New Hampshire Heckler to Romney: “Are You Going to Fire the Baby?!”

Mitt Romney’s stated love for firing people is already catching up with him on the hustings. Check out this video from earlier today in New Hampshire:

Evening Brief: Important Stories That You May Have Missed
A new study finds that women ask for raises and promotions as often as men, but get less in return.

An undocumented immigrant who helped New Jersey police solve a high-profile murder now faces deportation for coming forward.

Americans vastly overestimate the number of undocumented immigrants in the country.

The linchpin of Romney’s most powerful argument has turned out to be bogus.

TV stations refuse to yank “end Medicare” ads.

How Republicans will spin Romneycare.

New Hampshire students carry the nation’s highest debt load and the GOP has no solutions.

Congressional Budget Office finds that raising Medicare age would reduce Medicare spending by 5 percent, while increasing costs to seniors.

New “readily available and inexpensive” material could remove carbon dioxide from atmosphere at unprecedented rate.

 

 

Other recent Progress Reports

Jan 9, 2012: Mitt Romney, Job Killer

The Romney Record at Bain: Bankruptcies, Bailouts, & Mass Layoffs Mitt Romney’s pitch is that he’s a “businessman” who understands the “real economy,” in contrast to President Obama who Romney says “doesn’t understand how the economy works.” During a presidential debate in November, Romney reminded the audience of the source of his “real economy” experience: “I [...]

Jan 6, 2012: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

Jobs, By the Numbers 2…the number of years of consecutive employment growth in manufacturing, after not one single year of growth between 1997 and 2010. 8.5 percent…the unemployment rate, the lowest since February 2009 just after President Obama took office. 22…the number of consecutive months of private sector job growth. 12,000…the number of public sector [...]

Jan 5, 2012: Rick Santorum’s Most Outrageous Campaign Moments

Rising GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum is presenting himself to national audiences as a common sense conservative senator from a Democratic state with both economic and national security acumen. A late surge in Iowa led the former Pennsylvania senator to a near-win in that state’s caucuses and gave his campaign momentum ahead of next Tuesday’s [...]

Jan 4, 2012: Why The Appointment Of Richard Cordray Is A Victory For Middle Class Families

Nearly 18 months after the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the agency will finally have its first director. That’s because President Obama, using his power to make appointments during a congressional recess, announced today that he was appointing former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray — [...]

Media Matters for America — negative and questionable rhetoric from the right


Mark Sanford: Fort Sumter Shows South Carolina Doesn’t Take Orders

On WND, Frequent Fox Guest Geller Says Obama “Sounds Like … Kim Jong-Il Or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad”

“We’re All On Board If Mitt’s It”: Fox Growing More Open About Its GOP Advocacy

Mark Levin Hoax Caller’s “Death Panel” Lie Sets Off Right-Wing Echo Chamber

 

Conservative Media Back GOP Obstructionism, Attack Obama’s Appointment Of Cordray As CFPB Chief
Right-wing media have called President Obama’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) during a Senate recess of fewer than three days an “open declaration of war on constitutional principles” and an “unprecedented power grab.” However, neither the Constitution nor the courts have specified how long the Senate must be in recess for a president to make a recess appointment; past presidents have made recess appointments during recesses of three days or fewer; and congressional Republicans are engaged in unprecedented obstructionism that is preventing hundreds of Obama nominees from being confirmed. Read More

EU Special Offer — Amazing Climate Law!


 

Europe has just launched a ground breaking new climate law that radically reduces carbon pollution by forcing all airlines to pay for emissions. But China’s top-fliers are refusing — and threatening to spark a trade war!

 This ambitious law is like taking 30 million cars off the road each year! It is a huge step forward for our climate. But China’s top three airlines, who together make $3.5 billion in annual profits, are shamefully arguing that it will seriously damage business. In fact, even in the worst case scenario it would mean between a $3 – $10 passenger fee.  30% of their business is global and they want more. If enough of us urge them to put our planet before their extortionate profits, we could convince them to comply.

Let’s show these jet-setters how important public reputation is in global business and appeal to China’s new-found image as a country serious about combating climate change. Sign the petition now and share this with everyone — when we reach 500,000 signatures, we’ll deliver it to the companies with a big splash:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/china_dont_break_climate_law/?vl

Aviation is the fastest-growing source of carbon pollution in the world — it already accounts for more carbon emission than the entire economy of the UK which in and of itself is the world’s 10th biggest carbon polluter. Europe’s new law requires airlines to reduce emissions under the carbon trading system — it’s the only law that effectively combines economic incentive with legal obligation to put the brakes on this industry’s rampant pollution.

But China’s largest airlines are trying to dodge their responsibility, instead spreading false rumours that the rules mean exorbitant costs for both them and their passengers. The truth is airlines that reduce their emissions will make money from fuel saving initiatives. And even those that don’t clean up their ways and instead pass the costs along to passengers are unlikely to feel it — a flight from Beijing to London would cost an additional $1.53 — hardly noticeable compared to ticket prices and other hidden fees we all pay.

Last year US airlines tried to challenge the law with a shady lawsuit and were struck down in EU courts. There’s no reason why record-breaking profitable airlines can’t comply with an affordable climate-saving law. Let’s protect it and fight this latest Chinese threat with people power. These image-conscious airlines won’t be able to ignore our 500,000 strong outcry. Sign this urgent petition now and send it to everyone:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/china_dont_break_climate_law/?vl

The stakes have never been so high in our struggle to stop catastrophic climate change — we must propel every carbon-reducing measure and multiply it. China, as the world’s biggest investor in clean energy, has the power to pull the world onto the right path. Let’s demand that it’s government and businesses support this crucial EU leadership and comply with the law.

With hope and determination,

Jamie, Iain, Alice, Allison, Ricken, Wen-Hua, Wissam and the rest of the Avaaz team

Sources:

China CATA to sue EU on airline carbon rule (Reuters)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/24/china-eu-emissions-idUSL3E7NO01J20111224

EU’s aviation charge is a drop for China’s airlines (BBC)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16423633

 Chinese airlines dig their heels in over EU carbon charge as international dissent grows (The Daily Mail)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-2082586/Emissions-Trading-Scheme-China-airlines-dig-heels-EU-carbon-charge.html#ixzz1ihNBGysI

Asian airlines mull new charges to deal with EU carbon plan (Reuters)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/06/airlines-asia-idUSL3E8C40E320120106

Carbon Emission Fees for Flights Upheld (The New York Times)
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/22/business/global/court-upholds-europes-plan-to-charge-airlines-for-carbon-emissions.html?scp=2&sq=eu%20emissions%20airline%20lawsuit&st=cse

The Pulse: Clean car technology shift into high gear


 
 

Dear Friend,
Sometimes I wonder: will we ever have options for cleaner cars that are also affordable and fun to drive? Luckily, the answer from UCS engineers is: Yes, we will—and soon! Two recent events have shifted the future of the automobile into high gear. In November, the Obama administration proposed strengthened fuel efficiency and global warming emissions standards for cars and light trucks. The state of California followed with a suite of policies designed to foster the development of cleaner gasoline vehicles and electric car technology—for California and the nation. These two major steps are critical to putting the automobile industry on a course to develop the next generation of cleaner cars in all shapes, sizes, and price ranges—saving consumers money, curbing global warming emissions, and reducing our dependence on oil. —Karla
 
Science in Action
vehicle pollution Support strong, national clean car standards
The Obama administration is preparing to finalize rules that will nearly double fuel efficiency and cut emissions in half for new cars and trucks by 2025—but they’re not a done deal yet. Automakers and their allies are working behind the scenes to weaken or undermine the standards. Submit a comment today in support of cleaner cars. Hurry, the comment period ends soon!Click Here to Take Action
Share: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Cartoon of the Month   Links forYou
Cartoon: It's a hybrid!
Click to view larger image Share: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
  The future of the automobile shifts into high gear.
Sacramento Bee: Give consumers the choice of clean car future.
Congressman Issa seeks clean car controversy where there is none.
The UCS Model E family: a guide to the present and future of electric cars.
 
Ask the Scientist
Jim KlieschJim Kliesch, M.E.E.P.,
Research DirectorFollow
Jim’s blog
When I read about the government’s stricter fuel efficiency and global warming pollution standards for new cars, the numbers in the press accounts sounded too good to be true. The skeptic in me wondered: are they artificially inflated somehow? What will the new standards actually mean for the fuel economy of new car models in the real world?
-B, Von Holle, Oviedo, FL.
You are right to be skeptical. The tests used to determine the miles-per-gallon (mpg) figures in the government standards, and often echoed in the press, were developed about 40 years ago and driving styles and vehicle features have changed a lot since then. So these tests produce mpg numbers that run, on average, about 28 percent higher than the actual rates you would receive driving today’s cars on the road. But that doesn’t change the fact that the new standards will require automakers to produce vehicles that emit roughly half the global warming emissions produced by today’s new automobiles—and that’s very good news for our health and our planet. MOREShare:Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Do you have a question for UCS scientists? Submit your question today.

This Just In
Electric Vehicle CA leads the way to a clean car future
As part of a series of policies designed to reduce air pollution and drive technology development, California recently announced its intent to strengthen the Zero Emissions Vehicles (ZEV) program to require battery, fuel cell, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles to account for 1.4 million new vehicle sales in the state between 2018 and 2025. Although UCS analysis indicates that the target can and should be set higher, the ZEV proposal is a promising step that will drive innovation in clean vehicle technology and give car buyers in California—and nationwide—cleaner alternatives to gasoline-powered automobiles. MORE

MoveOn.Org …The Daily Share


What Has Obama Ever Done For Progressives?

What A Totally Honest Politician Would Say – click on link for video

http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6225843/the-whitest-kids-u-know-clint-webb

How One Governor Changed Her Mind On Gay Rights

willful Wednesday &some News


“The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. But education which stops with efficiency may prove the greatest menace to society. The most dangerous criminal may be the man gifted with reason, but with no morals.”

  — Martin Luther King, Jr., The Purpose of Education

   

just another rant …
We all might agree that in an election year the most important thing most voters on the fence should be asking themselves is which politician running for office has been the most authentic, has not just your list of things in mind but that of your family, friends, co-workers and those who are now in need. We know the middle and lower class have been routed and that is on the list of targets the Party of NO has as a mission. I ask you to stop and think about what President Obama has tried to do or has done for ALL Americans not just for a select few like we have seen coming from the Republican Party. The choice for President2012 in my opinion is obvious. Yes, I will support Barack Obama for a 2nd term but it is not because I am a person of colour though I admit no one not one Teapublican person opposing President Obama has minorities in mind; we are all a second thought a group of invisible people who as newt says need paychecks not food stamps and or entitlements. Well, some may know this now since he forced it upon us, but there are more Caucasian people on food stamps than African Americans and or people of colour. if you are a Woman, the war waged against us by Teapublicans has become personal for me and given what this Party of No claims; to be for less government one must search for a codebook to find out exactly what that means and what is it they want from the middle and lower classes because it ain’t equality. I wonder, do they expect us to accept separate but equal. Whatever It is; it is utterly apparent that “these people” feel, act, or negotiate nothing like our parents conservative politicians and here’s hoping We the People do not have to experience what they all have been jabbering about because it does not sound sane efficient or address what all Americans need to move into the 21st Century. I watch, listen, and wonder what kind of education these conservative Teapublican candidates for President have received or have they just become more jaded more narrow minded, as they got older as they appear. I think a President must be willing to fight for the rights of everyone especially for those in need. I still cannot and probably will not forget what Eric cantor and Santorum said to women about health care. It definitely made me realize why I vote for the Democratic Party more often than not. I am no expert and I do not play one or pretend to be one; I just have a lot to say or rant about. In my need to reach out to those who may still be wondering who should be our next President. I ask them to compare and contrast President Obama against the Teapublicans who claim to want to “restore America”“, take back our country”, or insist on if they do get into the WH, that all Americans will conform to their “Family Values” platform. After hearing what they do not want to do for “We the People”, please think about family friend’s co-workers or neighbors who will be negatively affected by this type of attitude and the consequences of such a way of thinking and or living.

 The best possible chance for our Democracy to continue forward VOTE for … BarackObama2012

Other News …

DNC Chair Assesses NH Primary, Looks Forward

Administration Holds Jobs Forum

President Obama Goes to Chicago for Campaign Fundraiser

Report on Security of Nuclear Materials To Be Released