 |
Selecting just ten best movies about black history is quite a challenge, but this is a very personal list. I am certainly not attempting to proclaim that…
read more |
 |
 |
We need to halve the amount of meat we eat or risk causing even more damage to the natural world than we already have.
read more |
 |
 |
So, there you have it. A pretty disturbing video that may help hammer home the point of just how bad single-use plastic really is.
read more |
 |
 |
Feinstein (D-Calif) announced she would introduce a bill re-instating the federal ban on assault weapons on the first day of the new Congress in January.
read more |
 |
Medicare has been providing health coverage for older adults and disabled Americans since 1965, and it’s a bit of a triumph of social insurance. The…
read more |
 |
Late last week, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced new air quality standards for fine particulate matter, or soot. This decision…
read more |
What’s the most important issue for you this election? The economy? Energy? Immigration? Chances are, one thing that springs to mind is “clean air,” since there’s not much of an election — or country — without it. New research by the NRDC Action Fund found that a whopping 193 House members and 39 Senators voted against preserving clean air standards every time an opportunity came across their desk.
These politicians must have invested in sophisticated artificial respiratory systems because unless I’m mistaken, they too need clean air to survive. No special technology? Well then, it must be the massive amount of campaign contributions these “dirty air villains” took from the country’s biggest polluter’s that’s made them so flippant when it comes to clean air.
The NRDC Action Fund analysis found that on average, House members who took more than $100,000 in polluter campaign contributions voted against clean air laws nearly twice as many times as those who took less from dirty industries. In the Senate, members taking more than $500,000 in career polluter campaign contributions voted against clean air laws three times as often as those taking less, on average. Contributions data was obtained from OpenSecrets in August, 2012.
All 193 Dirty Air Villains in the House are Republican. In the Senate, 37 Republicans and two Democrats voted down the line against clean air.
If you’ve ever doubted the impact that corporately-funded elections are having on your life, this is a blatant example. Regardless of how much a candidate claims to have the best interests of the people and country in mind, it’s absolutely essential to uncover who’s padding their pockets and how they’re voting on the issues that really matter. Clean air? Since when is that a partisan issue?! WE ALL NEED TO BREATHE.
The American Lung Association’s “State of the Air 2012″ report found that although the Clean Air Act has helped improve air quality in many areas (and saved $22 trillion in health care costs), over 127 million people — 41 percent of the nation — still suffer pollution levels that are too often dangerous to breathe.
“Our analysis reveals the full extent of Big Polluters’ reach into Congress, where some members, especially in the Tea party-influenced House, do not miss a single opportunity to side with the dirty industry, leaving the rest of us to fend for ourselves,” said Heather Taylor, director of the NRDC Action Fund. ”Our data will help people send a strong message to office-seekers: We want representatives in Congress who put the public first, not polluters.”
Want to know how your Congresspeople and Senators voted? Check out the full list at WhoVotesDirty.com. Make a list of the politicians that voted against your right to breathe clean air, and vote them out of office on November 6th.
Related Reading:
Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/meet-the-232-politicians-who-voted-against-clean-air.html#ixzz27LMSTZnd
 |
||||||
| August 10, 2012| View Online | ||||||
| Soot Pollution 101 | ||||||
| What You Need to Know and How You Can Help Prevent It By Jackie Weidman, Susannah Marshall
Earlier this summer the Environmental Protection Agency proposed updated clean-air standards that will prevent tens of thousands of premature deaths. The proposal comes in response to legal action calling upon the EPA to update final regulations for particle pollution. This rule is in line with the Clean Air Act’s requirements to protect public health and improve air quality. |
||||||
| Air Quality Awareness Week(April 30 – May 4) is a great opportunity to learn more about how your local air quality may affect your health. You may have heard references to “Code Orange” or “Code Red” air quality days during local weather reports. Air quality assessments are taken from the Air Quality Index (AQI), which indicates how clean or polluted your air is. Poor air quality can pose health concerns to children, older adults, and those with certain kinds of health issues; but even healthy young adults can be adversely affected by polluted air. Depending on the air quality and your level of sensitivity, staying indoors may sometimes help to alleviate symptoms. Other resources:
|
