April 15


 

taxpayerbigoil_giveawayTAX DAY …

It’s a day that warrants stress, sadness and if you listen to the teabag members it’s all about anger and complaints, but it doesn’t seem to have much to do with taxes … it’s strange, slightly crazy and while most of us may hate paying taxes if we have to we are also seriously happy if we get a refund. The anger coming from well-known Republican Politicians who support the TeaParty agenda seems steeped in ugly politics, policy and race least we talk about their move to abolish the IRS while their Chairman continues to spend taxpayer money on IRS hearings that are not only embarrassing, but he and his GOP co-horts actually rationalize Chairman Issa’s behavior .

Those who choose to be a part of the teaparty of today seem to hide the reasons for why they joined the movement. I wonder, did the original movement’s attitude include distain over a President who is African American or an economy that was shoved into the ditch. The house of Bush was given a surplus, but who cares right? The leaders of whatever the movement is called include SPalin/rlimbaugh/bachmann/tcruz and others like them have an agenda about something but it is not all about taxes. The fact that SPalin has raked in millions since losing her bid for the White House makes me wonder … is she still playing both side of the financial issue 6 years later.robin_hood_tax_bt duh

We continue to watch listen to conservative talking heads stir up trouble about why health-care is not working or being accepted by the public. It’s annoying frustrating and sad; people are afraid of the unknown people who talk don’t seem to understand what healthcare reform means for them or their families until they need it and well, over 7Million signed up and as the CBO has stated over 20Million will be signed up for Obamacare(ACA) by 2017. It’s important to know that our health care system needed to be fixed and because it has a 16% impact on our economy it needed to be moved into the 21st Century after decades of companies like AIG and others who have corrupted our American financial system. The notion that the crash is the fault of the current President is not only absurd one would think that after the SCOTUS decision Republicans in Congress would stop spending taxpayer money to rile their base with those fake votes on the floor that have no chance of a #ACA removal ~~ as it is PBO bill. I have to say it’s puzzling sad and embarrassing to know Republican members of Congress don’t care about how they look dragging a bill that is now a law onto the floor of Congress for the 55th time when so much work is needed to be done.

The downward spiral that our economy took started a long time ago; the problem is, no one tried to take care of it because folks were used to the status quo. The Party of NO wants Wall Street and big Banks to continue as before … is this what mainstreet Americans want? Hell NO

People need to listen to what is being said by Republicans because conservatives; specifically mitch mcconnell, speaker boeher, cornyn and others are manipulating the truth on the right.   We need to ask ourselves who in their right mind asks for money from Wall Street, attempts or manages to make a deal to try and stop or slow down new and stricter financial regulatory laws when it would be for the greater good. It’s obvious Republicans or IRS haters are making those so-called back room deals but from where I sit the deals are with the devil; specifically Wall Street, big Banks, lobbyists and other AIG types that got Americans into trouble in the first place and continue to do so

Now, we need a Democratic majority, which means getting off the midterm sidelines in 2014 vote for DEMOCRATS! They need to find the courage to implement tougher tax financial rules regulations policies that will keep those “partners” who helped ruin our economy honest.


 

the Rand family — — reminders


Ron Paul: More Freedom, Less Government, Lower Taxes, Strong National Defense

Ron Paul mailer predicted race war — Newsletters with signatures possibly from Paul ..some written in 1993

Freshman Congressman Rand Paul … Celebrated his Teapublican victory at a Private Country Club …

Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) said yesterday that Kentucky GOP U.S. Senate candidate Rand Paul’s positions should be the positions of the Republican Party. “I think a lot of us in the Republican Party would like to see Rand Paul and his voting and how he will vote in the U.S. Senate [become] the position of the Republican Party,” Bunning told reporters. Bunning, however, didn’t endorse Paul’s controversial view of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.TP

Rand Paul has been reported stating,  he would (modify)? maybe abolish Dept of Education, Farm Subsidies, Slash Medicare, Fair Housing Act, American Disabilities Act and believes any Public entity should be subjected to the rule of law but Private Ownership should have the right to refuse service to anyone they want; which, makes one wonder if Rand actually understands the 1964 Civil Rights Act or how and who potential business owners get the right to do business, Public or Private … uh City, State, Federal business license ….

From NBC’s John Yang
LOUISVILLE — Rand Paul wasn’t the only Tea Party-favored candidate to defeat an establishment candidate in Kentucky today.

UPS pilot Todd Lally ran away with the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic Rep. John Yarmuth in Kentucky’s 3rd Congressional District, which centers on Louisville. He beat three candidates, including Jeff Reetz, a Pizza Hut franchise owner who was the favorite of the House Republican campaign committee.

Lally is strongly pro-gun rights and anti-abortion rights. The Louisville Courier-Journal‘s editorial page said that during his endorsement interview, he said President Obama wouldn’t be able to get a security clearance if he wasn’t president and said health care reform was for the benefit of “freeloaders.”

Rachel Maddow interviews Kentucky Republican Senate nominee Rand Paul about how he reconciles his views on small government with civil rights, racism and segregation.

WASHINGTON – Kentucky Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul said Friday that President Barack Obama’s criticism of BP in the wake of the Gulf oil debacle sounds “really un-American.”  Paul, already facing a backlash over remarks earlier this week about civil rights legislation, criticized the Obama administration for declaring it will put its “boot heel on the throat of BP.” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs used similar language shortly after the spill.  In an interview Friday on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” Paul says the president’s response is part of the “blame game” that’s played in the United States. msnbc

The morning after he declined to endorse the totality of the Civil Rights Act in his much-discussed appearance on the Rachel Maddow Show, Dr. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) copped to feeling regret — not over his comments, but rather his decision to be interviewed by Maddow in the first place.

“It was a poor political decision and probably won’t be happening anytime in the near future,” the Tea Party endorsed Senate candidate said on the Laura Ingraham show on Thursday morning. “Because, yeah, they can play things and want to say, ‘Oh you believed in beating up people that were trying to sit in restaurants in the 1960s.’ And that is such a ridiculous notion and something that no rational person is in favor of. [But] she went on and on about that.”

Blaming the messenger is a tactic often used by politicians when the message itself is to blame. And Paul’s appearance on the Maddow show on Wednesday night was anything but bland. For 15 minutes, he and the host went back and forth in debating where there should be limits to government efforts to desegregate private institutions (Paul was skeptical that the government should play any role at all). But the notion that the MSNBC host was somehow unloading liberal hostilities on him doesn’t jibe with the fact that Paul got the same type of treatment during an NPR interview earlier that morning — or, for that matter, that a conservative voice on MSNBC, Joe Scarborough, seemed aghast at his answers. “He needs to come up with an answer today, or Kentucky will be Arizona: a battleground for ugly, racial politics,” Scarborough said. “He has 24 hours.”

(Paul, in fact, chose Maddow’s show to initially launch his Senate candidacy a year prior to last night’s appearance.)

Paul did seem to draw back (or tighten) his discussion of the Civil Rights Act during his interview with Ingraham.

“These are settled issues in the Civil Rights Act,” he said. “I have no intention of bringing up anything related to the Civil Rights Act… I think [segregation] is sort of a stain and blight on our history — so, no, I have never really favored any change in the Civil Rights Act or any of that. But they have seemed to unleash the loony left on me.”

In April of last year, Dr. Rand Paul was the featured guest speaker at an event held by the Constitution Party of Minnesota, whose stated goals include “restor[ing] American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations.”

Bruce Wilson

Bruce Wilson

Writes on religion and politics

Rand Paul Keynoted 2009 Rally for Far-Right Constitution Party

All you really need to know about Christian Reconstructionism is in the title of a January 2008 Talk To Action story of mine, More From The Biblical Stoning & Legalized Slavery Movement.

Enter Rand Paul.

Amidst the hullaballoo over Republican Rand Paul’s upset victory in the Kentucky GOP primary for US Senate, one of the few journalists to raise the issue of Paul’s somewhat uncomfortable proximity to Christian Reconstructionism has been Alternet’s Adele Stan, who observes that Rand Paul’s father Ron Paul is personal friends with one of the bigger names in the Christian Reconstructionist movement, Howard Phillips, founder of the US Taxpayers Party — now re-branded as The Constitution Party. But there’s much more direct evidence tying Ran Paul to the Constitution Party, whose national platform declares,

“The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations…The U.S. Constitution established a Republic rooted in Biblical law”

As Adele Stan notes, Phillips gave a keynote address at the Ron Paul For President Convention in Minneapolis a year and a half ago. And, Ron Paul endorsed the 2008 Constitution Party’s presidential candidate in the 2008 election, Chuck Baldwin.

As it’s said, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. In a May 21, 2009 appearance on the Alex Jones Show, Rand Paul affirmed that his political beliefs were extremely close to those of his father Ron:

Alex Jones: “You’re basically what I would call a chip off the old block. Your policies are basically identical to your father, correct?”Rand Paul: “I’d say we’d be very very similar. We might present the message sometimes differently.. I think in some ways the message has to be broadened and made more appealing to the entire Republican electorate because you have to win a primary.” [Rand Paul on Alex Jones, 5/21/09]

So it isn’t altogether surprising that Rand Paul could be found, in April 2009, at a rally held by a political party that’s been heavily influenced by a movement whose founder, Rousas Rushdoony, advocated executing homosexuals by stoning, wanted to reimpose the institution of slavery, and maintained that the Sun rotated around the Earth.

[below - video from Minneapolis "End the Fed" rally establishes that Rand Paul was in the vicinity prior to the Minnesota Constitution Party rally later that day. Note: the rally itself was not held by the MN Constitution Party.]

On April 25, 2009, Rand Paul was the featured guest speaker at The Constitution Party of Minnesota’s “event of the year.” I’ve found video of Rand Paul at an afternoon Minneapolis rally, so he was without a doubt in the vicinity.

Just to make sure I talked to Tammy Houle, whose phone number is the Minnesota Constitution Party listed contact number, and she confirmed to me that Rand Paul had indeed spoken at the April 25th evening event.

The odd thing about Rand and Ron Paul’s political tendency is that it offers liberals and progressives a number of points of agreement, probably more than with more ‘mainstream’ conservative GOP politicians. For example, Ron Paul has been a principled opponent of the invasion of Iraq and US military adventurism in the Mideast generally, and Rand Paul espouses the same position.

But it’s hard to get much more extreme than Christian Reconstructionism, whose founder Rushdoony was a Holocaust denier, a racist, a creationist, and an advocate for slavery who claimed that African-American slaves were lucky.

Weigh it for yourself — Howard Phillips, who founded the Constitution Party, has, according to journalist Frederick Clarkson, described Rousas J. Rushdoony as “my wise counseler.”

As Rushdoony wrote in Politics of Guilt and Pity:

The white man is being systematically indoctrinated into believing that he is guilty of enslaving and abusing the Negro. Granted that some Negroes were mistreated as slaves, the fact still remains that nowhere in all history or in the world today has the Negro been better off. The life expectancy of the Negro increased when he was transported to America. He was not taken from freedom into slavery, but from a vicious slavery to degenerate chiefs to a generally benevolent slavery in the United States. There is not the slightest evidence that any American Negro had ever lived in a “free society” in Africa; even the idea did not exist in Africa. The move from Africa to America was a vast increase of freedom for the Negro…

None of this, of course, is Rand Paul’s direct responsibility. But it certainly is suggestive.

And so, without further ado, here’s the April 9, 2009 post advertising Rand Paul’s April 25th appearance at the Minnesota Constitution Party “Liberty Banquet 2009″ that’s posted on Ronpaulforums.com :

The Constitution Party of Minnesota announces with anticipation, the event of the year — Liberty Banquet 2009Patriots and statesmen will come together on April 25th to hear featured guest,

Dr. RAND PAUL

Don’t miss this opportunity to unite with other like-minded folks for an evening of inspiration and motivation. The evening begins at 5:00 pm with a social hour, dinner at 6:00, followed by introductions and guest speakers. Preceding Dr. Paul, we will hear a few words from the two tenacious gentlemen that recently accepted the co-chairmanship of the CPMN Veteran’s Coalition, Leon Moe and John Salsbury.

The Chaska VFW will be the location of the event, which is located one block west of the intersection of Old Hwy. 212 and Hwy. 41 near downtown Chaska. The cost of tickets is $30 per person or 4 for $100. Get yours soon by sending payment to CPMN Treasurer, Patricia Becker, 23078 – 21st Avenue, St. Augusta, MN 56301.

Related News On Huffington Post:

A version of this post was originally published on Talk To Action.

Related News On Huffington Post:

Rand Paul Gently Rebuked By GOP Senators Over Civil Rights Act Opposition
Senate Republicans are cautiously distancing themselves from the controversial comments about civil rights legislation made by the GOP candidate who wants to join their caucus….
Top Dems Suggest Tea Party Might Be More Bark Than Bite

Top Democrats at the various campaign committees are expressing more and more confidence that they can overcome the wave of anti-government populist sentiment unleashed by…
Sarah Palin: Rand Paul’s ‘Libertarian Streak’ Will Ward Off ‘Leftist Liberal Overreach’

Former Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin spoke Wednesday night about the positives of the establishment-shaking victory of Rand Paul, the Tea Party and Palin-supported…
Rand Paul: Obama Sounds ‘Un-American’ For Criticizing BP Over Gulf Oil Spill (VIDEO)

In attempting to close the book on his controversial statements about the scope of the Civil Rights Act, Kentucky Senate candidate Rand Paul invited another…
Rand Paul Is ‘Kentucky Fried Candidate’ Over Civil Rights Comments

WASHINGTON (AP) — A tea party conservative on a national stage, Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul of Kentucky labored Thursday to explain remarks suggesting businesses…
Is Rand Paul The Real Deal Or Just A One-Hit Wonder?

“Washington is horribly broken.” “The debt bomb is ticking.” Those were the words spoken by newly-christened Kentucky Republican Senate nominee Rand Paul during his victory…
Rand Paul Blasted By James Clyburn Over Civil Rights Act: ‘He Is Not Good For This Country’ (VIDEO)

GOP leaders in Congress have been cautious — if not tepid — in their rebuke of Kentucky Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul for his refusal…

Civil Rights Activist Rosa Parks


 

On This Day: February 4

Rosa Parks
Born: February 4, 1913
Died: October 24, 2005
Age: 92 years old
Birthplace: Tuskegee, AL, United States
Occupation: Activist

Read Rosa Parks’ biography >>

Thoughts and prayers


After yet another horrific tragedy in Fort Hood this week, we here at the Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility would like to offer our thoughts and prayers for all of those affected by this terrible event.

But we know all too well that our thoughts and prayers aren’t enough — we have to offer something more. It is times like this that we are reminded that only together can we address gun violence in our communities, here in our state and across the nation.

Fort Hood Needs More than Our Prayers

We in Washington State are standing together and taking the first step in addressing this problem: We’re going to bring I-594, which would apply existing background checks to all firearm sales in Washington, to the ballot in November.

Take a stand. Join us. Become part of the solution at our Ju‌ne 2‌n‌d event — just click here to RSVP.

In the face of these tragedies, we need to join hands and work together to make our state safer — and we can’t do it without you.

Thank you,

Zach Silk
Campaign Manager
Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility

 

IMMIGRATION: a repost from 2010 ThinkProgrss


The Neo-Know Nothings

In the heat of the fiery debate over Arizona’s anti-immigrant law SB-1070, a new attack on immigrant rights is burgeoning within the Republican Party. On Monday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) joined a growing number of GOP policymakers seeking to review or revoke the citizenship clause of 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” While the call to revoke this birthright citizenship was traditionally confined to fringe political parties and right-wing demagogues, the rising call to repeal the amendment is becoming a mantra of the Republican mainstream. But in championing reform of birthright citizenship, Republican lawmakers are directly undermining “revered U.S. constitutional traditions” and reversing “one of our nation’s unique achievements, embodied in the current president and many others: that descent does not mean destiny.”

FRINGE POLITICS: The effort to revoke birthright citizenship has traditionally been a tenet of fringe, right-wing political groups. Indeed, the anti-immigrant bigotry expressed by contemporary right-wing radicals like former congressman Tom Tancredo reflects the xenophobia present around the time that the 14th Amendment was adopted. In the 1840s and 1850s, the nativist, anti-immigrant Know Nothing Party “rose to prominence” at the “zenith of Boston’s anti-Irish feeling” by opposing “foreign immigration” of Irish Catholics and believing that “Americans must rule America.” As Mother Jones’ Jen Phillips points out, “when you substitute the tea party for the Know Nothings, and Mexicans and Latinos for the Irish, and Phoenix for Boston,” the Know Nothing stance provides a “pretty accurate” reflection of today’s right-wing anti-immigrant sentiment. Another long-standing radical group, the John Birch Society, has been “speaking out” against immigration since 1963 and has called for “congressional action to end automatic birthright citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants.” While the Society insists it represents a mainstream members “from all walks of life,” conservative leader William Buckley “famously denounced” the Society in the early 1960s as “‘idiotic’ and ‘paranoid.’” Now, the Tea Party has picked up the banner, with Kentucky Senate candidate and Tea Party favorite Rand Paul (R) insisting that the constitutional right to citizenship “should be stopped.” A tell-tale sign of the radical nature of today’s right-wing demagoguery is the increasingly virulent rhetoric, characterizing undocumented workers as an “invading army,” using children to secure public benefits and demonizing them as “anchor babies,” a “politically charged term” used to “make these children sound non-human” and “to spark resentment against immigrants.” A “widely circulated” and blatantly sexist email by Minutemen member and Patriots Coalition founder Al Garza said “we need to target the mother” to address “the anchor baby racket” because “men don’t drop anchor babies, illegal alien mothers do.” Last year, Fox News host Glenn Beck sought to legitimize this sentiment, saying “the anchor baby thing has hacked me off…that baby is a child. It’s an anchor. It’s an anchor to stay here. … Why do we have automatic citizenship upon birth?”

MAINSTREAMING THE FRINGE: While previously relegated to the margins of the right wing, Republican policymakers are now embracing the extreme viewpoint and bringing the “anchor baby,” anti-birthright rhetoric into the legislative arena. After crafting the draconian SB-1070 law, Arizona State Sen. Russell Pearce (R) has set his sights on an “anchor baby bill” — because granting citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants born on U.S. soil is somehow an “outrageous” “violation of the 14th Amendment.” Despite the twisted logic, Pearce’s idea echoes a burgeoning trend on Capitol Hill. Since 1995, Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-CA) has tried and failed seven times to pass legislation that would repeal or reinterpret the 14th Amendment. Reflecting growing popularity, Bilbray is receiving help from senior Republican Rep. Lamar Smith (TX), whose legislation to deny birthright citizenship has 93 cosponsors, including House Republican Study Committee Chairman Rep. Tom Price (GA). While these efforts have precedent in the House, the notion of 14th Amendment revision is now taking hold in the Senate. Once thought to be a proponent of comprehensive immigration reform, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) announced last week that he is considering a constitutional amendment to overturn birthright citizenship because that constitutional right is “a mistake.” Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) supported congressional hearings into the amendment that would question whether citizenship is “a reward” for “illegal behavior.” And Sen. McCain (R-AZ), who once preferred a path to legalization for undocumented immigrants over “pleas[ing] the political extremists,” joined his colleagues in calling for hearings against the amendment. In embracing a traditionally radical idea, these senators have moved to the right of outspoken immigration hawks like Lou Dobbs, who insist that “the rule of law” requires recognizing children of undocumented immigrants as “citizens of this country.”

CHANGING THE CONSTITUTION: In their rush to eradicate birthright citizenship from the Constitution, Republican lawmakers are “squarely outside the American tradition.” As a Center for American Progress (CAP) report explains, the conservatives base their exclusive view on “specious” legal reasoning around the Dred Scott v. Sanford case, which found that “only descendants of those fortunate enough to be embraced by the founding generation could claim citizenship.” Conservatives insist that the framers of the 14th Amendment rectified the citizenship issue solely for slave descendants and did not intend it to be extended to immigrants. But, as the CAP report notes, framers of the 14th Amendment “explicitly rejected” that notion of America as a “country club.” As one framer put it at the time, “we are entirely ready to accept” that under the proposed amendment, “children born here” of immigrant parents “shall be declared by the Constitution of the United States to be entitled to civil rights and to equal protection before the law with others.” In two landmark decisions, the Supreme Court verified this “clear constitutional mandate” of birthright citizenship, ruling in 1982 that the “fourteenth amendment extends to anyone, citizen or stranger” regardless if “a person’s initial entry into a State, or the United States, was unlawful.” Not only would Republican efforts overturn the Supreme Court’s “time-tested reading” of the Constitution, but their “regressive approach” would have practical implications on American competitiveness, as evidenced by Germany’s restrictions on citizenship for migrant workers. Now, in Germany, “nearly half of foreign students” and “most children from migratory backgrounds, are assigned to the lowest educational track (Hauptschule), which primarily prepares them for low-skilled jobs.” Germany also has the largest disparity in an OECD study that examines immigrant versus native student academic performance. In “a startling contrast,” the majority of the 40 finalists in the 2010 Intel Science Talent Search were first-generation Americans, children of immigrants born on U.S. soil. By removing the constitutional citizenship right, Republicans would flout the Constitution and risk undermining unique achievement within the American citizenry.